Biomedical Science Letters

eISSN 2288-7415

Table. 3.

Summary of detection methods for carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales

Tests method Accuracy TAT Detection Limitation Accessibility
Modified Hodge test Moderate Next day Carbapenemase activity Poor sensitivity for NDM High (LDT)
Poor specificity with AmpC*
mCIM High Next day Carbapenemase activity None known High (LDT)
Carba NP Moderate Next day Carbapenemase activity Poor sensitivity for OXA-48 Moderate (commercial)
Double disk synergy test High Next day Carbapenemase activity None known Moderate (LDT)
Gradient MIC strip
(E-test KPC or MBL)
Moderate Next day KPC or MBL Detects only KPC or MBL Moderate (commercial)
Poor specificity with AmpC
MALDI-TOF MS High Within day Carbapenemase activity None known Low-moderate
(LDT)
PCR (multiplex PCR, real-time PCR) High Within day Specific carbapenemase gene Unable to detect novel carbapenemase Low-moderate (commercial)
Microarray High Within day Specific carbapenemae gene Unable to detect novel carbapenemase Low-moderate (commercial)
Whole-genome sequencing High Several days Carbapenem resistance mechanism Unable to detect novel carbapenemase Low (LDT)

Abbreviations: TAT, turnaround time; mCIM, modified carbapenemase inactivation methods; LDT, laboratory developed test

aAccuracy: high, >90% sensitivity and specificity, moderate, 70~90% sensitivity and specificity; low, <70% sensitivity and specificity

bTurnaround time, time to results from pure culture of isolate

cAccessibility; High, all clinical microbiology laboratories could perform this test; moderate, advanced clinical microbiology laboratories could perform this test; low, reference laboratories could perform this test

Biomed Sci Letters 2023;29:109-20 https://doi.org/10.15616/BSL.2023.29.3.109
© 2023 Biomed Sci Letters